«Working Paper No. 2010/56 Women and Landed Property in Urban India Negotiating Closed Doors and Windows of Opportunity Bipasha Baruah* May 2010 ...»
This study emphasizes the importance of granting full legal tenure to residents of upgraded slums. While it is generally assumed that unequal land access is an outcome of unequal gender relations, our findings suggest that marginalization of low-income urban women in the ownership of landed assets may also be the result of rivalry between different groups of men, or the inability of certain male groups to acquire control over landed property. If full legal land tenure continues to remain out of reach for slum populations, it will increase their reliance on informal processes, such as political alliances and bribes to government officials, to ensure tenure security. This will further undermine women’s access to and control over landed property, as it increases their dependence on men’s networks of informal power. While slum communities have relied upon these methods out of necessity to ensure tenure security, this study asserts that these strategies are, at best, perceived as phases on the continuum towards full legal tenure, not long-term solutions. This is especially true for women’s needs and priorities.
Enhancing women’s ability to secure independent titles to urban land and housing is a long-term goal for organizations like SEWA. Joint titles are a step in the right direction, although the obstacles, as detailed in this paper, are quite significant. Overall, policy initiatives in women’s education, reform of the judiciary and governance, public awareness campaigns, equality in resettlement schemes and land allocation processes as well as equal access to credit and technological inputs are valuable in ensuring that land rights have the potential to transcend gender relations.
Abbott, P., C. Wallace, and M. Tyler (2005). An Introduction to Sociology: Feminist Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
Agarwal, B. (1994). A Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Agarwal, B. (2003). ‘Gender and Land Rights Revisited: Exploring New Prospects via the State, Family and Market’. Journal of Agrarian Change, 3 (1): 184-224.
Antrobus, P. (2005). ‘Critiquing the MDGs from a Caribbean Perspective’. Gender & Development, 31 (1): 94-104.
Banerjee, B. (2002). ‘Security of Tenure in Indian Cities’. In A. Durand-Lasserve and L. Royston (eds), Holding Their Ground: Secure Tenure for the Urban Poor in Developing Countries. London: Earthscan Publications Limited, 37-58.
Basu, S. (1999). She Comes to Take Her Rights: Indian Women, Property and Propriety. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Basu, S., and R. S. Rajan (eds) (2006). Issues in Contemporary Indian Feminism:
Dowry and Inheritance. London and New York: Zed Books.
Chant, S. (1997). Women Headed Households: Diversity and Dynamics in the Developing World. London: Macmillan.
Cooper, B. (1997). Marriage in Maradi: Gender and Culture in a Hausa Society 1900Oxford: James Currey.
Doss, C., C. Grown, and C. D. Deere (2008). ‘Gender and Asset Ownership: A Guide to Collecting Individual-Level Data’. WB Policy Research Working Paper 4704.
Washington, DC: World Bank.
Durand-Lasserve, A., and L. Royston (eds) (2002). Holding Their Ground: Secure Tenure for the Urban Poor in Developing Countries. London: Earthscan Publications Limited.
Gilbert, A. G. (1999). ‘A Home Is Forever? Residential Mobility and Home Ownership in Self-Help Settlements. Environment and Planning A, 31: 1073-91.
Jackson, C. (2003). ‘Gender Analysis of Land: Beyond Land Rights for Women?’.
Journal of Agrarian Change, 3 (4): 453-80.
Kumar, S. (1996). ‘Landlordism in Third World Urban Low-income Settlements: Case for Further Research’. Urban Studies, 33 (4-5): 753-82.
Mearns, R. (1999). ‘Access to Land in Rural India: Policy Issues and Options’. World Bank discussion paper. Available at www.econpapers.repec.org/paper/ wbkwbrwps/2123.htm.
Moser, C., and L. Peake (1987). Women, Human Settlements and Housing. London and New York: Tavistock Publications.
Parasher, A. (1992). Women and Family Law in India: Uniform Civil Code and Gender Equality. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Rosen, L. (1978). ‘Law and Social Change in the New Nations’. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20 (1): 3-28.
Roy, A. (2003). City Requiem, Calcutta: Gender and the Politics of Poverty.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sharma, K. (2002). ‘Surviving Violence, Making Peace: Women in Communal Conflict in Mumbai’. In K. Kapadia (ed.), The Violence of Development: The Politics of Identity, Gender and Social Inequalities in India. New Delhi: Kali for Women, 183Tinker, I., and G. Summerfield (1999). Women’s Rights to House and Land: China, Laos, Vietnam. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
UNDP (1995). Human Development Report 1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UN-Habitat (2003). The Challenge of Slums. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
UNIFEM (2000). Progress of the World’s Women. New York: UNIFEM.
Unni, J. (1999). ‘Property Rights for Women: Case for Joint Titles to Agricultural Land and Urban Housing’. Economic and Political Weekly, 34 (21): 1281-6.
Volbeda, S. (1989). ‘Housing and Survival Strategies of Women in Metropolitan Slum Areas in Brazil’. Habitat International, 13 (3): 157-71.
Whitehead, A., and D. Tsikata (2003). ‘Policy Discourses on Women’s Land Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Implications of the Return to the Customary’. Journal of Agrarian Change, 3 (1): 67-112.
World Bank (2001). Engendering Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yapi-Diahou, A. (1995). ‘The Informal Housing Sector in Abidjan, Ivory Coast’.