FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstracts, online materials

Pages:     | 1 || 3 | 4 |

«\\jciprod01\productn\M\MIA\68-1\MIA101.txt unknown Seq: 1 13-NOV-13 8:14 FUTURLAWMA: 21st Century Solutions to 31st Century Problems JUSTIN S. WALES1 ...»

-- [ Page 2 ] --

20. Frequently Asked Questions: Membership Questions, ALCOR.ORG, http://www.alcor.org/ FAQs/faq06.html (last visited Apr. 1, 2013).

21. Frequently Asked Questions: General Questions, ALCOR. ORG, http:// www. alcor. org/ FAQs/faq01.html (last visited Apr. 1, 2013).

22. Frequently Asked Questions: Membership Questions, supra note 20.

23. Id.

24. Id. (“Alcor places $25,000 into the Trust for each neuropatient and $115,000 for each whole body patient.”).

25. See generally Adam A. Perlin, “To Die in Order to Live”: The Need for Legislation Governing Post-Mortem Cryonics Suspension, 36 SW. U. L. REV. 33 (2007).

26. Frequently Asked Questions: Membership Questions, supra note 20.

27. Frequently Asked Questions: General Questions, supra note 21.

28. Cardiopulmonary Support in Cryonics, ALCOR.ORG, http://www.alcor.org/Library/html/ CardiopulmonarySupport.html (last visited Apr. 1, 2013).

29. Id.


31. See, e.g., Robert L. Steinback, Frozen in Time, MIAMI HERALD, Sept. 17, 2002, at 1E.

\\jciprod01\productn\M\MIA\68-1\MIA101.txt unknown Seq: 6 13-NOV-13 8:14


to the point where scientists can successfully cryogenically preserve organs, blood, and embryos,32 and even revive a person after as long as three-and-a-half hours of being declared clinically dead.33 While it is uncertain whether Dr. Ettinger’s theories on immortality are scientifically valid, such a discussion is beyond both the scope of this article and the intelligence of its author. What we can say with some confidence, however, is that “[a]lthough no one can quantify the probability of cryonics working... certainly nobody can say it is zero.”34 B. “Why must you analyze everything with your relentless logic?”35 Continuing under the assumption that Dr. Ettinger’s theories will eventually be vindicated by science, fundamental beliefs concerning mortality, death, and religion will need to be reevaluated. For the purposes of this article, however, we will limit the scope of our inquiry to two fundamental questions: What does it mean to die, and how must society adapt to a fundamental change in that meaning? As we will see, such questions are not easily answered.

Beliefs about death are deeply personal. Often rooted in faith and religion, the confidence or uncertainty about what becomes of our soul or spiritual life-force at death is not of our immediate concern. Philosophers and religious leaders will certainly struggle with such questions if cryonic reanimation becomes a reality, much as they have struggled with such questions from time immemorial.

Compared to such divine inquiries, defining the moment life ceases seems simple. According to medical standards, death occurs when a body experiences “the permanent absence of respiration and circulation.”36 Under such a definition, however, technologies that leave open the likelihood of future reanimation could fundamentally alter our concept of death. Because we can never be certain that at some point in the future a scientific resurrection of our vitality will occur, permanence no longer can be considered the deciding factor in determining death.

Bioethicists have struggled with the meaning of death and have, throughout modern history, offered different biological definitions for

32. Ryan Sullivan, Pre-Mortem Cryopreservation: Recognizing a Patient’s Right to Die in Order to Live, 14 QUINNIPIAC HEALTH L.J. 49, 55–56 (2010).

33. Cardiac Resuscitation After 3.5 Hours on ‘Autopulse’ Support Pump, ARWATCH.CO.UK, http://arwatch.co.uk/2011/02/cardiac-resuscitation-after-3-5-hours-on-%E2%80%98autopulse%E 2%80%99-support-pump (last visited Apr. 1, 2013).

34. Notable Quotes, supra note 16.

35. Futurama: The Cryonic Woman (FOX television broadcast Dec. 3, 2000).



DETERMINATION OF DEATH 3 (1981), available at http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/ past_commissions /defining_death.pdf.

\\jciprod01\productn\M\MIA\68-1\MIA101.txt unknown Seq: 7 13-NOV-13 8:14 2013] FUTURLAWMA 93 the term.37 What remains constant in the various explanations of death, however, is the idea of permanence. In this sense, “death is not an event, nor even a process, but rather a prediction; a prediction that such and such an individual will not be seen alive again.”38 If technology could allow a legally or biologically “deceased” individual to be reanimated, that individual’s suspended state cannot truly be classified as “dead” according to any accepted definition and must, at least semantically, be distinguished.

C. “No! I want to live! There are still too many things I don’t own!”39 To better illustrate the problems with defining the present status of a cryogenically preserved individual, let us create our own hypothetical.

Let’s say a woman, we will call her Catherine, suffers from a terminal illness that will undoubtedly cause her death within six months of diagnosis. Catherine is forty years old, has two young children, was predeceased by her husband, and is the owner of a considerable estate.

Wishing to avoid the indignity of a slow death, Catherine contacts a cryogenics facility and agrees to have her body cryogenically frozen before both her legal and biological death in the hope that medical science will eventually be able to cure her illness and she will be able to resume her life in the future. In other words, according to a modern understanding of the terms, Catherine “wishes to die in order to live.”40 Under the current state of the law, Catherine faces a number of challenges. While an individual may legally have his or her body cryogenically stored,41 pre-mortem preservation still implicates pertinent state interests in preventing homicide and suicide.42 The California Court of Appeals, in a 1992 decision, rejected a declaratory petition by mathematician Thomas K. Donaldson that would have recognized his constitutional right to pre-mortem cryonic suspension.43 Donaldson, like our fictional character Catherine, was diagnosed with a terminal condition—an inoperable brain tumor—that would ultimately result in his death.44 Arguing that his “right to privacy and self-determination are paraSee generally id.

38. Thomas A. Robinson, Stop! Are You Sure You Want to Throw Grandpa’s Body Away?, 63 U. MIAMI L. REV. 37, 54 (2008).

39. Futurama: The Honking (FOX television broadcast Nov. 5, 2000).

40. Donaldson v. Lungren, 4 Cal. Rptr. 2d 59, 60 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992).

41. See Perlin, supra note 25.

42. Id. at 51.

43. Donaldson, 4 Cal. Rptr. 2d at 61, 65.

44. Id. at 60.

\\jciprod01\productn\M\MIA\68-1\MIA101.txt unknown Seq: 8 13-NOV-13 8:14


mount to any state interest in maintaining life,” Donaldson asked the court to allow him to do with his body as he wished.45 Relying on thenrecent right-to-die cases that held that patients possess a constitutional right to refuse life-saving medical treatment,46 Donaldson argued that such case law creates a legal fiction that authorizes a form of suicide that is essentially indistinguishable from the type he wishes to commit.47 Recognizing that Donaldson makes a “persuasive argument that his specific interest in ending his life is more compelling than the state’s


interest in preserving life in general,”48 and that Donaldson “may take his own life,”49 the Court rejected his right to die by another’s hands, because, by doing so, it would prevent “public officers from performing official acts that they are required by law to perform.”50 Under California law, “[t]he coroner is required to inquire into deaths involving suicide or homicide and to carry out his or her inquiry, may take custody of the remains and examine the body of a homicide or suicide victim.”51 The Court, unwilling to grant Donaldson’s petition, stated that such a matter was better suited for the state’s legislature.52 No legislation currently exists that would specifically address the needs of people like Donaldson or our fictional Catherine.53 Supposing such legislation was passed, however, the question of how to classify a cryonic patient’s present status must be answered. The next section will analyze how such a patient’s rights and duties would differ according to the legal status of pre-mortem cryogenically preserved individuals.

DEAD?!”54 1. “THE CAT, ALIVE DEAD? ALIVE IS IT OR OR In 1935, physicist Erwin Schrodinger developed his now-classic ¨ thought experiment as a critique of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. The experiment involved a hypothetical cat trapped in a steel chamber along with a Geiger counter containing a small radioactive substance. Within an hour, the small radioactive substance had an equal probability of decaying or of remaining constant. If the atomic substance decays, the counter tube will discharge, and through a relay, release a hammer that shatters a flask filled with hydrocyanic acid that

45. Id. at 61.

46. Id. (citing Cruzan v. Director, Mo. Dep’t. of Health, 497 U.S. 261, 278 (1986)).

47. “As is often true in times of social transition, case law creates fictions to avoid affronting previously accepted norms.” Id. at 63.

48. Id.

49. Id.

50. Id. at 64.

51. Id.

52. Id.

53. Perlin, supra note 25, at 37, 52.

54. Futurama: Law and Oracle (Comedy Central television broadcast July 7, 2011).

\\jciprod01\productn\M\MIA\68-1\MIA101.txt unknown Seq: 9 13-NOV-13 8:14 2013] FUTURLAWMA 95 will kill the cat. If the substance does not decay, the cat will remain unharmed. Schrodinger argued that, according to quantum-mechanic ¨ theorists, the cat is both alive and dead, in equal parts, until the box is opened and the true state of the cat becomes known.55 The Schro- ¨ dinger’s Cat thought experiment, though absurd by design, presents a scenario not completely unlike our hypothetical with the fictional character Catherine.

If Catherine’s cryogenically preserved body is deemed “alive” in the eyes of society and the law, the implications of her existence are undoubtedly many. For one, how do Catherine’s heirs’ (or heirs apparent, perhaps) rights change because of Catherine’s supposed “life”? The law has typically limited the rights one has to control one’s assets or property after they meet his or her worldly end. The policy against dead hand control can be plainly seen by analyzing the Rule Against Perpetuities. The Rule Against Perpetuities, as all law school graduates will recall, requires that a “contingent future interest must vest, if at all, within twenty-one years after the expiration of some life in being when the interest was created.”56 The Rule Against Perpetuities thus restricts dead hand control by requiring that some required event occur within a set amount of time after the death of all parties to the contract. Such a restriction poses a philosophical, although not necessarily a practical, obstacle for Catherine supposing she wishes to financially provide for her family after her cryonic suspension while wishing to keep open the possibility of reclaiming her residual assets upon reanimation.

As a practical matter, with proper preparation, Catherine could avoid the imposition of the Rule Against Perpetuities from spoiling her estate plan. An antiquated and difficult to understand relic of feudal law,57 the Rule Against Perpetuities has been significantly modified or repealed in about one-third of the states.58 In states that have abrogated the Rule, courts have upheld the creations of dynasty trusts that allow a trust to last for centuries, or even, in perpetuity.59 If Catherine did not have the foresight to relocate to a state that has abandoned the use of the Rule Against Perpetuities, the question of whether Catherine will be able

55. John D. Trimmer, The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics: A Translation of Schrodinger’s “Cat Paradox” Paper, 124 PROC. OF THE AMER. PHIL. SOC’Y 323, 328 (1983).


56. Igor Levenberg, Personal Revival Trusts: If You Can’t Take It With You, Can You Come Back to Get It?, 83 ST. JOHN’S L. REV. 1469, 1478 (2012) (quoting Jesse Dukeminier & James E.

Krier, The Rise of the Perpetual Trust, 50 UCLA L. REV. 1303, 1304 (2003)).

57. See Lucas v. Hamm, 364 P.2d 685, 690 (Cal. 1961) (holding that an attorney has not committed legal malpractice by inadvertently violating the Rule Against Perpetuities while drafting a will because the Rule is so difficult to apply).

58. Dukeminier & Krier, supra note 56, at 1314.

59. Note, Dynasty Trusts and the Rule Against Perpetuities, 116 HARV. L. REV. 2588, 2591 (2003).

\\jciprod01\productn\M\MIA\68-1\MIA101.txt unknown Seq: 10 13-NOV-13 8:14


to create a trust which provides for her estate to pass through her lineal heirs but will return to her if she is reanimated becomes uncertain.

Under the Rule Against Perpetuities, a contingent interest must vest within twenty-one years of all lives in being.60 The difficulties of classifying Catherine’s cryogenic state as a “life in being” have already been discussed in this article and whether she is or isn’t considered a life will likely be a question left to state legislatures. If she is considered a “life in being,” the trust would be valid under the Rule Against Perpetuities.

Pages:     | 1 || 3 | 4 |

Similar works:

«INSTITUTIONS AND CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT* ARMIN FALK UNIVERSITY OF BONN ARMIN.FALK@UNI-BONN.DE, DAVID HUFFMAN UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD DAVID.HUFFMAN@ECONOMICS.OX.AC.UK, AND W. BENTLEY MACLEOD COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY BENTLEY.MACLEOD@COLUMBIA.EDU Abstract. We conduct laboratory experiments where the market rules mimic labor market institutions, and exogenously vary institutions to study the causal impact on subjects’ behaviors. We focus on rules analogous to dismissal barrier institutions, such as...»

«Cite as 23 I&N Dec. 814 (BIA 2005) Interim Decision #3518 In re E-L-Het al., Respondents Decided by Board August 18, 2005 Decided by Attorney General December 1, 20041 Decided by Board January 30, 19982 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A precedent decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals applies to all proceedings involving the same issue unless and until it is modified or overruled by the Attorney General, the Board, Congress,...»

«REGISTRATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 49 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT NAME OF UNDERTAKING: Mink Farm Bonavista Mink Farms Inc. 15,000 Breeder Farm PROPONENT: (i) Name of Corporate Body: Bonavista Mink Farms Inc. (ii) Address: 263 Memorial Drive Suite 202 Clarenville, NL A5A 1R5 (iii) Chief Executive Officer: Mr. Jorn Mogensen President/Owner 263 Memorial Drive Suite 202 Clarenville, NL A5A 1R5 (709) 427-6810 (iv) Principal Contact: Mr. Brian Burke Burke Consulting Inc. 7 Somerset Place CBS,...»

«RACIAL STEREOTYPING IN THE NEWS: Some General Semantics Alternatives t GREGG HOFFMANN* T change in many areas the our the mediaAmong those positiveis have power to be catalysts for HE NEWS MEDIA of culture. areas racial stereotyping. Instead, often perpetuate stereotyping. Many of the images of African-Americans, Hispanics, AsianAmericans, American Indians, and other minorities are shaped by the news media. It is my contention that many of those images are based on stereotypes. A variety...»

«‘THE AGE OF SCHOOL SHOOTINGS’: A SOCIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION ON MASCULINITY ‘LA ERA DE LAS MASACRES EN LAS ESCUELAS’: UNA INTERPRETACIÓN SOCIOLÓGICA SOBRE LA MASCULINIDAD Volumen 15, Número 1 Enero Abril pp. 1-21 Este número se publicó el 1° de enero de 2015 DOI: dx.doi.org/10.15517/aie.v15i1.17586 Jorge Celis Revista indizada en REDALYC, SCIELO Revista distribuida en las bases de datos: CATÁLOGO DE LATINDEX, IRESIE, CLASE, DIALNET, DOAJ, E-REVIST@S, SHERPA/ROMEO, QUALIS, MIAR...»

«The Role of Segregation and Pay Structure on the Gender Wage Gap: Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data for Spain * Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes San Diego State University & IZA and Sara de la Rica * University of the Basque Country & IZA We wish to thank David Card, Ronald Oaxaca, and seminar participants at the University of Tucson and at the University of Berkeley for helpful comments in earlier drafts of the paper. Financial help from the Spanish Ministry of Science (SEC2003-04826) is...»

«Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 18 | Issue 4 Article 1 8-1998 Religious Discourse on the Conflict in Nagorno Karabakh Hratch Tchilingirian Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Tchilingirian, Hratch (1998) Religious Discourse on the Conflict in Nagorno Karabakh, Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 18: Iss. 4, Article 1. Available at:...»

«Akhbar Key Barey Mey Suwal Jawab Yeh Risalah Sheykh-e-Tariqat Ameer-e-Ahl-e-Sunnat bani-eDawat-e-Islami, Hazrat Allamah Maulana Abul Bilal Muhammad Ilyas Attar Qadiri Razavi ‫ دَاﻣـﺖ ﺑَـﺮﻛَـﺎ ُﺗـﻬـﻢ اﻟـ ْﻌ َـﺎﻟ ِـﻴ َـﻪ‬ney tehreer farmaya hey, ْ َ َْ ُُ Majlis-e-Tarajim ney isko Roman-English mey compose kiya hay. Agar is mey koi kami-beyshi paain to Majlis-e-Tarajim ko aagah kar kay Sawab kay haqdar baniye Majlis Tarajim...»

«A Report by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman Nigel Newcomen CBE Investigation into the death of a man at HMP Preston in October 2013 Our Vision ‘To be a leading, independent investigatory body, a model to others, that makes a significant contribution to safer, fairer custody and offender supervision’ This is the investigation report into the death of a man, who died from throat cancer on 7 October 2013 at HMP Preston. He was 61 years old. I offer my condolences to the man’s family and...»

«` Using your FSA to pay for Dental Expenses Eligible Dental Expenses Dental procedures such as teeth cleaning, sealants, fluoride treatments, X-rays, fillings, extractions, dentures and other dental ailments are all eligible expenses that can be paid for with your Flexible Spending Account (FSA). When paying for these expenses, the options listed below are available to you. Remember, the eligible amount is the amount that is designated as your final patient financial responsibility after...»

«99 József Andor: Interrogating possessive have: a case study Argumentum 9 (2013), 99-107 Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó József Andor Interrogating possessive have: a case study Abstract Major, standard grammars of English give an account and interpret interrogatively used possessive have as a unique specialty of genres and text types of British English. Reviewing descriptions offered by some of these grammars and presenting empirically based evidence on acceptability of usage and function, the...»

«[Cite as Girard v. Youngstown Belt Ry. Co., 134 Ohio St.3d 79, 2012-Ohio-5370.] THE CITY OF GIRARD, APPELLANT, v. YOUNGSTOWN BELT RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Girard v. Youngstown Belt Ry. Co., 134 Ohio St.3d 79, 2012-Ohio-5370.] Federal preemption—Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act—49 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.—Eminent domain. (No. 2011-1850—Submitted June 19, 2012—Decided November 21, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Trumbull County, No. 2010-T-0079,...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2017 www.abstract.dislib.info - Abstracts, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.