«CLERK ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court BRYAN LEE CIYOU Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE ...»
-- [ Page 2 ] --
In sum, Schmidt is unable to establish that the trial court’s judgment is contrary to law. See Curley, 896 N.E.2d at 32. Neither the trial court’s findings nor its conclusions are clearly erroneous. See Yanoff, 688 N.E.2d at 1262. Thus, we must affirm the trial court’s denial of Schmidt’s request for injunctive relief.
Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.