WWW.ABSTRACT.DISLIB.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstracts, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«Abstract. Coherence and alignment of the legislative language highly contribute to the quality of legislative processes, to the clarity of ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

A linguistic-ontological support for multilingual legislative

drafting: the DALOS Project

Enrico Francesconi, Pierluigi Spinosa, Daniela Tiscornia

Institute of Legal Information Theory and Techniques, Italian National Research

Council (ITTIG-CNR), Italy

{francesconi,spinosa,tiscornia}@ittig.cnr.it

Abstract. Coherence and alignment of the legislative language highly contribute

to the quality of legislative processes, to the clarity of legislative texts and to their

accessibility. DALOS aims at ensuring that legal drafters and decision-makers have control over the multilingual language of European legislation, and over the linguistic and conceptual issues involved in its transposition at national levels. The project will contribute to this goal by providing law-makers with linguistic and knowledge management tools to support the legislative drafting activity.

Keywords: Legislative drafting, multiligualism, domain ontology, lexical taxonomy

1. Introduction Coherence, interoperability and harmonization in the legislative knowledge of, and control over, the legal lexicon is a precondition for improving the quality of legislative language and for facilitating access to legislation by legal experts and citizens. In a multilingual environment, and in particular, in EU regulations, only the awareness of the subtleties of legal lexicon, in the different languages, can enable drafters to maintain coherence among the different linguistic version of the same text. This is as much important for the EU Member State legal orders, strongly influenced by the obligation to implement EU directives.

To face this problem recently the DALOS1 project has been launched within the “eParticipation” framework, the EU Commission initiative aimed at promoting the development and use of Information and Communication Technologies in the legislative decision-making processes, with the aim to foster the quality of the legislative production, to enhance accessibility and alignment of legislation at European level, as well as to promote awareness and democratic participation of citizens to the legislative process.

In particular DALOS aims at ensuring that legal drafters and decisionmakers have control over the legal language at national and European level, by providing law-makers with linguistic and knowledge manageDrAfting Legislation with Ontology-based Support 104 Francesconi, Spinosa, Tiscornia ment tools to be used in the legislative processes, in particular within the phase of legislative drafting.

Nowadays the key approach for dealing with lexical complexity is the ontological one, by which we mean a characterisation (understood both by people and processed by machines) of the conceptual meaning of the lexical units and of their connection with other terms. On the basis of an ontological characterisation of legal language DALOSwants to provide law-makers with linguistic and knowledge management tools to support legislative drafting in a multilingual environment.

In this paper an overview of the DALOS project is given. In particular in Section 2 the complexity of the multilingual legal scenario is addressed; in Section 3 the characteristic of the DALOS linguisticontological approach is discussed; in Section 4 the specification of the DALOS Knowledge Organization System (KOS) is presented; in Section 5 the methodologies to implement the DALOS ontological-linguistic resource are shown; finally in Section 6some conclusions are reported.

2. Interfacing multilingual legal terminologies

In legal language every term collection belonging to a language system, and any vocabulary originated by a law system, is an autonomous vocabulary resource and should be mapped through relationships of equivalence with the others. Based on the assumption that in a legal domain one cannot transfer the conceptual structure from one legal system to another, it is obvious that the best approach consists in developing parallel alignment with the same methodology and the same conceptual model. Different methods may be applied, depending on the characteristic of the domain, the data structure and on the result to achieve.

As regards the data structure, the first consideration is that unstructured list of terms (as for instance traditional flat terminologies) cannot be mapped in a consistent way, but only connected by a one-to-one correspondence among terms, which is an invalid approach for a context dependent technical terminology, such as law vocabulary. Among

structured data different degrees of formalization can be distinguished:

− controlled vocabularies (such as thesauri, classification trees, directories, key-words lists): terms are organized in taxonomic trees, linked by generic associative relations, and concepts are implicitly expressed by lists of preferred and variant terms (descriptors/nondescriptors);

The DALOS Project − semantic lexicons, also called computational lexicons or lightweight ontologies are based on commonly accepted semantic definitions and on a limited formal modeling;

− foundational, core, and domain ontologies are formal models (logical theories) of a conceptualization of a given domain, often based on axiomatic definitions.

The integration of lexical resources (heterogeneous because belonging to different law systems, or expressed in different languages, or pertaining to different domains) leads to different final results depending





on the desired results:

− generate a single resources covering both (merging);

− compare and define correspondences and differences (mapping);

− combine different levels of knowledge representation, basically interfacing lexical resources and ontologies.

Of the three strategies, the methodological approach for DALOS requires the definition of mapping procedures among semantic lexicons, driven by the reference to an ontological level where the basic entities which populate the legal domain are described. In the next section the semantic structure of the lexical component is outlined.

2.1. A legal semantic lexicon: the LOIS database

Semantic lexicons are a means for content management which can provide a rich semantic repository. Compared to formal ontologies, semantic lexicons are lightweight ontologies as they are based on a weak abstraction model, with limited formal modeling, since constraints over relations are based on the grammatical distinctions of language (noun, verbs, adjectives, adverbs), for instance the agent-role relation holds between a noun (agent) and a verb or event denoting nouns (action) ((Castagnoli et al., 2006)) In the legal field, one of the wider semantic lexicons currently available is the LOIS database2 composed by about 35.000 concepts in five European languages (English, German, Portuguese, Czech, and Italian, linked by English).

In LOIS a concept is expressed by a synset, the atomic unit of the semantic net. A synset is a set of one or more uninflected word forms (lemmas) with the same part-of-speech (noun, verb, adjective, created within the European project LOIS (Legal Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing, EDC 22161, 2003-2006) 106 Francesconi, Spinosa, Tiscornia and adverb) that can be interchanged in a certain context. For example action, trial, proceedings, law suit form a noun synset because they can be used to refer to the same concept. More precisely each synset is a set of wordsenses, since polysemous terms are distinct in different wordsenses. A synset is often further described by a gloss, explaining the meaning of the concept. English glosses drive cross-lingual linking.

In monolingual lexicons terms are linked by lexical relations: synonymy (included in the notion of synset), near-synonym, antonym, derivation. Synsets are linked by semantic relations of which the most important are hypernymy/hyponymy (between specific and more general concepts), meronymy (between parts or wholes), thematic roles, instance-of.

Cross-lingual linking is based on equivalence relations of each synsets with an English synset: these relations indicate complete equivalence, near equivalence, or equivalence as a hyponym or hyperonym. The network of equivalence relations, the Inter-Lingual-Index (ILI), determines the interconnectivity of the indigenous wordnets. Language-specific synsets from different languages linked to the same ILI-record by means of a synonym relation are considered conceptually equivalent. The LOIS approach are not completely language-independent, since the equivalence setting passes throughout the English wordnet and the English translation of glossas support the localization process.

The lesson learned from the LOIS experience is that a limited language independence could be enough for cross-lingual retrieval tasks, but that it could be a weak point when considering re-using, extending, updating the semantic connections or when integrating external lexical resources (for instance multilingual thesauri) within the framework.

What is needed is “the distinction between conceptual modeling at a language-independent level and a language and culture specific analysis and description of discourse-related units of understanding” (Kerremans and Temmerman, 2004).

These consideratons led us to make clear distinction, when designing

the overall model of DALOS and the system architecture, among:

− types of knowledge − layers of knowledge representation − classes of semantic relationships between knowledge elements.

The DALOS Project

3. Which knowledge for the DALOS service?

DALOS aims at providing a knowledge resource on the basis of the LOIS experience.

The two projects however address two different scenarios: while the LOIS knowledge resource is addressed to multiligual legal information retrieval, the DALOS knowledge resource is expected to support legislative drafting.

This distinction of the addressed scenario is particularly important because it contributes to identify the type of knowledge to be described within the DALOS service, so to avoid the so called epistemological promiscuity addressed by Breuker and Hoekstra (Breuker and Hoekstra, 2004), namely the common attitude to “indiscriminately mixing epistemological knowledge and domain knowledge in ontologies” which prevents knowledge representations from being automatically reusable outside the specific context for which the knowledge representation was originally developed.

As underlined by (Boer et al., 2004) the “norm is an epistemological concept identified by its role in a type of reasoning and not something that exclusively belongs to the vocabulary of the legal domain”. As argued, “knowledge about reasoning – epistemology – and knowledge about the problem domain – domain ontology – are to be separated if the knowledge representation is to be reusable” (Boer et al., 2004).

The DALOS case addresses the legislative drafting process, namely a process that creates norms on specific domains to be regulated. What is needed therefore is a knowledge and linguistic support giving a description of concepts, as well as their lexical manifestations in different languages, in specific domains before they are regulated.

In particular, for the DALOS knowledge resource, avoiding epistemological promiscuity means to avoid that the knowledge to be used as support for legislative drafting (domain knowledge) is mixed with the knowledge on the general process of drafting (epistemological knowledge) which, obviously, pertains to different domains (see also (Biagioli and Francesconi, 2005)).

According to previous works (Biagioli, 1997) the epistemological knowledge related to the legislative drafting process can be modelled by the Model of Provisions which establishes a taxonomy of provision types (rules as definition, obligation, prohibition, sanction) and amendments (insertion, repeal, substitution) which describe legislative texts irrespective to the domain addressed, and pertain to the process of legislative drafting. Such kind of knowledge therefore will not be described by the DALOS resource, which, on the contrary, will contain knowledge on a 108 Francesconi, Spinosa, Tiscornia domain of interest. In particular for the aim of developing a project pilot, the “consumer protection” domain has been chosen.

4. KOS of the linguistic-ontological resource In this phase of the project the most part of the activities are addressed to provide the specification for the DALOS resource. Chosen the domain of interest (“consumer protection”) currently the activities for domain

knowledge specification are oriented to:

− the standards to be used for knowledge representation;

− the Knowledge Organization System (KOS).

As regards the standards, the RDF/OWL standard conversion of WordNet approved by the W3C standards will be used for the linguistic resource (), thus guaranteeing interoperability as well as scalability of the solution.

As regards KOS, on the basis of the arguments expressed in Section 2.1, the DALOS resource is expected to be organized in two layers of

abstraction (see Fig. 1):

− the ontological layer containing the conceptual modeling at a language-independent level;

− the lexical layer containing the lexical manifestations in different languages of the concepts at the ontological layer.

Basically the ontological layer acts as a knowledge layer where to align concepts at European level independently from the language and the legal order, according to the EU Commission recommendations for Member State legislations. Moreover the ontological layer allows to reduce the computational complexity of the problem of multilingual term mapping (N-to-N mapping). Concepts at the ontological layer act a “pivot” meta-language in a N-language environment, allowing the reduction of the number of bilingual mapping relationships from a factor N 2 to a factor 2N. Concepts at the ontological layer are linked by taxonomical (is_a) as well as object property relationships.

On the contrary the lexical layer aims at describing language-dependent lexical manifestations of the concepts of the ontological layer. At this level terms will be linked by linguistic relationships as those ones used for the LOIS database (hyperonymy, hyponymy, meronymy, etc.).

In particular, to implement the lexical layer, the subset of the LOIS The DALOS Project



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«Proven ML-800 User Manual Mesa Labs’ Commitment As a manufacturer of critical equipment, quality is the highest priority in our manufacturing process. Mesa Labs commits to providing creative, innovative thinking and the engineering and scientific expertise needed to produce gas flow-related products and solutions that are universally recognized for their superior performance, quality and value. Proven DryCal technology is the recognized leader in gas flow measurement, providing the...»

«Lock-Ups, Squeeze-Outs, and Canadian Takeover Bid Law: A Curious Interplay of Public and Private Interests Christopher C. Nicholls* Securities law permits takeover bidders to enter Le droit régissant le marché des valeurs into prebid lock-up agreements with major target mobilières autorise le vote sur les actions obtenues dans shareholders. Lock-up agreements may have a stifling le cadre d’un accord de fermeture en pré enchère dans effect on takeover auctions, but allowing them is des...»

«United States Prevention, Pesticides EPA-738-F-94-013 Environmental Protection And Toxic Substances September 1994 Agency (7508W) R.E.D. FACTS Metalaxyl All pesticides sold or distributed in the United States must be registered Pesticide by EPA, based on scientific studies showing that they can be used without Reregistration posing unreasonable risks to people or the environment. Because of advances in scientific knowledge, the law requires that pesticides which were first registered years ago...»

«European Green Leaf 2015 Section A City Introduction & Context Give an overview of your city including its population, surface area, geographical location, some historical background, notable features and any other factors which have influenced or will influence the environment within the city and its surrounding area. What are the key environmental challenges the city faces (or has addressed in the recent past)? Make reference to the city’s infrastructure (transport, water and drainage,...»

«Murphy v. Franklin Pierce CV-93-65-B 11/17/94 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Nancy D. Murphy v. Civil N o. C-93-65-B Franklin Pierce Law Center MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Nancy Murphy suffers from a chronic vision impairment known as diplopia.1 After being dismissed as a Franklin Pierce Law School student, she sued the Law Center alleging that she was the victim of unlawful discrimination on the basis of her disability and sex in violation of § 504 of the...»

«aws of the game l WAY 20 13 KIDS PATH U6 to U12 Everyone plays a part. Laws of the Game 2013 Kids Pathway U6 to U12 This document contains Law modifications applicable to all games played under the Australian TryRugby Kids Pathway. This covers games played from the U6 to U12 age groups inclusive. Not all applicable Laws are contained in this document, only modifications from standard Law. Where there is no modification, the IRB Laws of the Game 2013, the IRB International U19 Law Variations and...»

«Wholly Communion, Literary Nationalism, and the Sorrows of the Counterculture Daniel Kane Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media, Volume 52, Number 1, Spring 2011, pp. 102-127 (Article) Published by Wayne State University Press DOI: 10.1353/frm.2011.0023 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/frm/summary/v052/52.1.kane.html Access Provided by University of Sussex at 11/05/12 4:32PM GMT Figure 1. Allen Ginsberg in Wholly Communion, Figure 2. Adrian...»

«Original File Date: October 8, 2010 Last Update: October 15, 2010 No. 102,570 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ELIZABETH SHIRLEY, as MOTHER and NEXT FRIEND for ZEUS GRAHAM, Appellant, v. IMOGENE GLASS, BAXTER SPRINGS GUN & PAWN SHOP, and JOE and PATSY GEORGE, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the...»

«AP/2014/7R PROCEEDINGS Meeting of the Assembly of Parties November 6, 2014 1. The Annual Meeting of the Assembly of Parties (the Assembly) of the International Development Law Organization (IDLO) was held at the “Sala della Protomoteca”, Rome City Hall, on November 6, 2014. In addition to representatives of IDLO Member Parties, representatives of 21 states, as well as representatives of the European Union, UNDESA, IFAD, DEVEX, and the Sovereign Order of Malta attended the meeting. [A list...»

«[17] Children, families and the law A view of the past with an eye to the future Helen Rhoades OVER THE YEARS A great deal of scholarship has been devoted to scrutinising the interaction between family law reform and social change. As John Dewar has noted, family law is peculiarly sensitive to its social environment, due in no small part to the constantly changing nature of its subject matter: family relationships (Dewar, 1998). This observation is particularly pertinent to Part VII of...»

«The University of Chicago Press http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233369. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at. http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of...»

«United States Government Accountability Office Office of the General Counsel September 2006 Procedures and Practices for Legal Decisions and Opinions GAO-06-1064SP September 2006 This document contains procedures and practices for legal decisions and legal opinions of the Comptroller General of the Government Accountability Office. The Office of General Counsel (OGC) is the component of GAO responsible for providing opinions to Congress, its committees, and Members, and for providing decisions...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2017 www.abstract.dislib.info - Abstracts, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.